I was cruising Yahoo in hopes of finding some quality
numbers to crunch for my blog post this week when I ran across an interesting
news story. Apparently NBC is looking to replace Jay Leno as host of the
Tonight Show in favor of Late Night Host Jimmy Fallon. I found this interesting because I can pretty
vividly remember the huge battle which ensued Leno’s removal from his spot as
The Tonight Show host four years ago when NBC replaced him with Conan O’Brian. When I first read the article I had a “here
we go again” type thought; however, upon further examination I saw that they
were basing their decision to replace Leno on the basis of a survey measurement
technique called a Q score. Apparently
when NBC made the decision to replace Leno back in 2009 his positive Q score
was 21 and his negative was 26 whereas O’Brian’s positive and negative scores
lay at 13 and 38 respectively. This time
around Leno’s positive is 12 whereas his negative is 24 and Fallon’s scores are
positive 10 and negative 27. If we were
to evaluate the difference between 2009 and 2013 for Leno there is a 9 point
positive difference and two point negative difference. Both scores have dropped which according to
Marketing Evaluations Inc. is bad in that Leno’s overall popularity has gone
down considerably; however, his negative image has also decreased (the article
in Forbes cites that in the peak of his battle with O’Brian his negative was as high as 38). The difference between O’Brian and Fallon is
a drop in positive of three points and an eleven point drop in negative
perception.
When I
pursued the meaning of the Q test on Marketing Evaluations website I was
allowed to view quite a few different sales pitches for the company’s different
product lines; however, nowhere on the site did it inform me exactly what the
survey entailed. I found it very
interesting that although Marketing Evaluations Inc. would be willing to tell
me how Howard Zinn or Martin Luther King would sell their product they wouldn’t
be willing to let me see how their product measured what it measured. It would seem that after our discussions in
class about survey transparency in order to measure efficacy of measurement
that this company is not operating within the standards of survey policies;
however, it is possible that this is because their subject matter borders on
the vacuous.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.